The claim is not correct as both the triangles do not meet the SAS triangle congruence criterion.
What is SAS Conguency ?
If any two sides and angle included between the sides of one triangle are equivalent to the corresponding two sides and the angle between the sides of the second triangle, then the two triangles are said to be congruent by SAS rule.
As from the definition above we can understand that for the triangles to be congruent the sides and the angle included between them should be same.
In the given triangles
The two sides of both the triangle has same length but the angle 30 degree is not the angle included for both the traingles
Therfore we can say that the triangles are not congruent with SAS congruency.
To know more about SAS Congruency
https://brainly.com/question/7888063
#SPJ2